The following are the ARGH power ratings after games of September 25, 1999.
The estimated home field advantage is .590. Home field advantage is the estimated chance that the home team would win a game between two otherwise equal teams.
Mea Culpa Department. Last week I wrote:A note for those of you who look only at the won-lost records of a team: let me remind you that this system looks not only at a team's record, but at how many points they scored and gave up, how many home games a team has played, who they've played, who they've played, and so on. If you expect a 1-3 team that has lost close games to three top ten teams -- for the sake of argument, let's call this team Notre Dame -- to be somewhere in the bottom part of the rankings, then you're bound to be disappointed. The system judges the team's results, but it also judges the context in which the team achieved the results, and each week it adjusts that context based on the results of that week. As a result, a team that loses can rise in the ratings, and a team that wins can drop. And a team can be ranked above someone that has beaten them. The key is that all teams are judged consistently.
This doesn't mean that there aren't ratings that I can't make sense of, especially early in the season where putting together power ratings is as much art as science. And it doesn't mean that there aren't quirks in the system; every system has them. But the hypothetical Notre Dame team I mentioned has been handled quite properly... much though I might wish it weren't...
In the immortal words of Roseanne Rosannadanna, "Never mind."
The system as I intended it works very much the way I said. I've been able to explain the more obvious quirks this year by the teams' performances against predictions, and those explanations worked well.
In fact, they worked too well.
The system has always implemented a penalty for losses in the past and it just wasn't doing it this year. It turns out that a parameter that I installed six years ago and hadn't touched since had been altered when I was in the process of revising the home field routines. As a result, the system posted in previous weeks this year had been based entirely on points scored and allowed and had totally ignored wins and losses. I don't know whether that mix is any more or less accurate over the long term than what the system was supposed to use, although it was a little less accurate this last week. But I do know that at this time the ARGH Power Ratings are supposed to have a 50-50 mix of won-loss record and points scored. I'll follow the predictions for the rest of the year to see whether there might be a reason to change the mix.
Anyhow, this week I'm including an extra column under the ratings. Along with this week's rankings and last week's rankings (Last Week Reported), there will be a column for what the rankings should have been last week (Last Week Actual). Most teams' rankings weren't affected all that much, but a few, generally the ones that generated the most complaints, moved quite a bit.
And if you still think Notre Dame's 1-3 record means they belong in the bottom part of the rankings, then you're still in for a disappointment...
This Week | Last Week's Actual | Last Week's Reported | Team | Record | Power Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | Florida St. | 4 - 0 | 0.892 |
2 | 2 | 2 | Nebraska | 4 - 0 | 0.882 |
3 | 8 | 6 | Michigan St. | 4 - 0 | 0.847 |
4 | 3 | 3 | Michigan | 4 - 0 | 0.843 |
5 | 6 | 5 | Texas A&M | 3 - 0 | 0.840 |
6 | 5 | 8 | Florida | 4 - 0 | 0.825 |
7 | 4 | 9 | Penn State | 5 - 0 | 0.811 |
8 | 7 | 7 | Purdue | 4 - 0 | 0.800 |
9 | 9 | 4 | Tennessee | 2 - 1 | 0.766 |
10 | 16 | 18 | Kansas St. | 3 - 0 | 0.757 |
11 | 10 | 14 | Marshall | 4 - 0 | 0.749 |
12 | 19 | 24 | Virginia Tech | 3 - 0 | 0.744 |
13 | 15 | 12 | Syracuse | 3 - 1 | 0.735 |
14 | 24 | 17 | Oregon | 3 - 1 | 0.721 |
15 | 12 | 11 | Georgia Tech | 2 - 1 | 0.714 |
16 | 18 | 16 | Texas | 4 - 1 | 0.707 |
17 | 14 | 22 | Southern California | 2 - 1 | 0.706 |
18 | 17 | 21 | Georgia | 3 - 0 | 0.704 |
19 | 28 | 28 | Virginia | 3 - 1 | 0.701 |
20 | 23 | 23 | Alabama | 3 - 1 | 0.701 |
21 | 25 | 27 | Mississippi St. | 4 - 0 | 0.699 |
22 | 11 | 13 | Ohio St. | 3 - 1 | 0.696 |
23 | 31 | 38 | East Carolina | 4 - 0 | 0.693 |
24 | 13 | 10 | Miami, Florida | 2 - 2 | 0.669 |
25 | 35 | 34 | Utah | 3 - 0 | 0.660 |
26 | 21 | 25 | Arkansas | 2 - 1 | 0.657 |
27 | 42 | 35 | Mississippi | 3 - 1 | 0.656 |
28 | 26 | 20 | Southern Mississippi | 2 - 2 | 0.647 |
29 | 38 | 41 | Stanford | 3 - 1 | 0.636 |
30 | 32 | 33 | Miami, Ohio | 3 - 1 | 0.633 |
31 | 20 | 26 | Air Force | 2 - 1 | 0.629 |
32 | 53 | 52 | Oklahoma | 3 - 0 | 0.625 |
33 | 40 | 43 | Louisiana Tech | 2 - 2 | 0.624 |
34 | 36 | 36 | Minnesota | 3 - 0 | 0.622 |
35 | 30 | 15 | Notre Dame | 1 - 3 | 0.622 |
36 | 22 | 32 | Auburn | 3 - 1 | 0.620 |
37 | 43 | 47 | Illinois | 3 - 1 | 0.611 |
38 | 33 | 37 | Brigham Young | 2 - 1 | 0.602 |
39 | 39 | 45 | Missouri | 2 - 1 | 0.588 |
40 | 37 | 19 | Wisconsin | 2 - 2 | 0.586 |
41 | 52 | 53 | Wyoming | 2 - 1 | 0.584 |
42 | 29 | 30 | UCLA | 2 - 2 | 0.581 |
43 | 41 | 40 | Colorado St. | 2 - 1 | 0.579 |
44 | 44 | 46 | Louisiana St. | 2 - 1 | 0.574 |
45 | 45 | 49 | Maryland | 3 - 0 | 0.567 |
46 | 34 | 29 | Colorado | 2 - 2 | 0.558 |
47 | 51 | 42 | Oklahoma St. | 2 - 1 | 0.551 |
48 | 50 | 48 | Idaho | 2 - 1 | 0.548 |
49 | 47 | 54 | Iowa St. | 3 - 1 | 0.548 |
50 | 48 | 39 | North Carolina | 1 - 2 | 0.545 |
51 | 64 | 70 | Vanderbilt | 3 - 1 | 0.545 |
52 | 27 | 44 | North Carolina St. | 3 - 2 | 0.541 |
53 | 54 | 55 | Tulane | 2 - 1 | 0.532 |
54 | 68 | 62 | San Diego St. | 2 - 2 | 0.529 |
55 | 59 | 51 | Washington | 1 - 2 | 0.528 |
56 | 57 | 65 | Arizona | 3 - 2 | 0.526 |
57 | 56 | 60 | Oregon St. | 3 - 0 | 0.523 |
58 | 76 | 81 | Wake Forest | 2 - 1 | 0.515 |
59 | 46 | 31 | Houston | 2 - 2 | 0.511 |
60 | 70 | 84 | Boston College | 3 - 0 | 0.504 |
61 | 49 | 50 | New Mexico St. | 3 - 1 | 0.503 |
62 | 55 | 56 | Louisville | 2 - 2 | 0.489 |
63 | 63 | 75 | California | 2 - 1 | 0.484 |
64 | 77 | 74 | AL-Birmingham | 1 - 2 | 0.483 |
65 | 61 | 57 | Clemson | 1 - 2 | 0.475 |
66 | 60 | 59 | West Virginia | 1 - 3 | 0.469 |
67 | 66 | 64 | Toledo | 2 - 1 | 0.466 |
68 | 62 | 68 | Kentucky | 2 - 2 | 0.451 |
69 | 65 | 63 | Pittsburgh | 2 - 1 | 0.448 |
70 | 58 | 58 | Arizona St. | 1 - 2 | 0.446 |
71 | 78 | 72 | Memphis | 1 - 3 | 0.440 |
72 | 67 | 66 | Western Michigan | 2 - 2 | 0.440 |
73 | 98 | 98 | Texas-El Paso | 2 - 2 | 0.432 |
74 | 71 | 89 | Northwestern | 2 - 2 | 0.431 |
75 | 80 | 80 | Fresno St. | 2 - 2 | 0.428 |
76 | 72 | 69 | Texas Tech | 1 - 2 | 0.410 |
77 | 82 | 86 | Iowa | 1 - 2 | 0.399 |
78 | 74 | 67 | Indiana | 1 - 3 | 0.396 |
79 | 75 | 73 | Texas Christian | 1 - 2 | 0.395 |
80 | 88 | 85 | San Jose St. | 2 - 2 | 0.392 |
81 | 73 | 71 | Central Florida | 0 - 4 | 0.384 |
82 | 87 | 79 | Cincinnati | 2 - 2 | 0.376 |
83 | 84 | 87 | Utah St. | 1 - 2 | 0.370 |
84 | 81 | 76 | Rice | 1 - 3 | 0.367 |
85 | 97 | 93 | Eastern Michigan | 1 - 2 | 0.353 |
86 | 69 | 61 | Kansas | 1 - 3 | 0.352 |
87 | 102 | 111 | Hawaii | 3 - 1 | 0.340 |
88 | 79 | 77 | Duke | 0 - 3 | 0.324 |
89 | 89 | 95 | Central Michigan | 1 - 3 | 0.318 |
90 | 101 | 106 | Northeast Louisiana | 2 - 2 | 0.312 |
91 | 83 | 83 | Washington St. | 0 - 4 | 0.308 |
92 | 100 | 103 | Boise State | 2 - 2 | 0.307 |
93 | 96 | 92 | Navy | 1 - 3 | 0.303 |
94 | 92 | 78 | New Mexico | 1 - 3 | 0.294 |
95 | 106 | 100 | Army | 1 - 2 | 0.288 |
96 | 91 | 96 | Tulsa | 1 - 3 | 0.284 |
97 | 85 | 82 | Nevada | 0 - 4 | 0.283 |
98 | 93 | 97 | Nevada-Las Vegas | 2 - 2 | 0.281 |
99 | 86 | 88 | Bowling Green | 1 - 3 | 0.278 |
100 | 95 | 104 | Akron | 2 - 2 | 0.276 |
101 | 94 | 91 | Rutgers | 0 - 3 | 0.247 |
102 | 107 | 101 | Ohio | 1 - 3 | 0.244 |
103 | 105 | 110 | North Texas | 1 - 2 | 0.241 |
104 | 99 | 99 | South Carolina | 0 - 4 | 0.240 |
105 | 90 | 90 | Southern Methodist | 0 - 3 | 0.236 |
106 | 103 | 94 | Baylor | 0 - 4 | 0.223 |
107 | 109 | 112 | Connecticut | 2 - 2 | 0.223 |
108 | 104 | 105 | Middle Tennessee St. | 1 - 3 | 0.215 |
109 | 108 | 102 | Arkansas St. | 0 - 4 | 0.211 |
110 | 110 | 109 | SW Louisiana | 1 - 3 | 0.210 |
111 | 115 | 114 | Kent | 1 - 3 | 0.190 |
112 | 114 | 107 | Northern Illinois | 0 - 4 | 0.157 |
113 | 111 | 113 | Temple | 0 - 4 | 0.154 |
114 | 113 | 115 | Wild Card U. | 4 - 35 | 0.145 |
115 | 112 | 108 | Ball St. | 0 - 4 | 0.142 |
116 | 116 | 116 | Buffalo | 0 - 3 | 0.058 |
The following are the current power ratings for the various conferences:
Conference | OOC Record | Power Rating |
---|---|---|
Big Ten | 28-7 | .640 |
SEC | 22-4 | .620 |
Big Twelve | 23-10 | .587 |
ACC | 12-5 | .586 |
Pac-10 | 14-10 | .546 |
Mountain West | 13-8 | .520 |
Big East | 12-12 | .496 |
Conference USA | 14-13 | .495 |
Independents | 7-19 | .382 |
WAC | 10-16 | .359 |
Big West | 9-16 | .352 |
MAC | 9-22 | .331 |
Click here to send me feedback